Study Method And Participant Information Statement ESSAY

Study Method And Participant Information Statement

1. Identify your data collection method(s) e.g., survey, interview, observation, secondary data analysis, systematic literature review (SLR), why you chose it, and how your chosen approach will enable you to meet your objectives and answer your research question(s). Note that secondary data does not mean literature it means data collected by others. For example, exit interview data collected by your HR department or satisfaction surveys from guests. Explain your sample frame and sampling method; That is , how will your select study participants from the list of possible participants?

We write papers for students

Tell us about your assignment and we will find the best writer for your paper.

Get Help Now!

2. Write and submit the statement that you will use to inform your study participants about your study; be sure to include who is conducting it, its purpose (briefly), what they can expect if they do or do not participate. You may find the link to this article (Links to an external site.) useful even though it is geared toward clinical trials, parts of it are appropriate for our purposes too.

3. Don’t forget to FINISH your work on Write-n-Cite this week for 2 marks.

Rubric
Learning Activity #3 (1)Learning Activity #3 (1)CriteriaRatingsPtsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeData Collection RationaleIdentified your data collection method(s) and provided explanation why the method is appropriate for your study type and study objectives using references to the definitions of study type from the text or other reliable reference. Note that the entire questionnaire or instrument is not necessary here! Only your planned approach.3 to >0.0 ptsFull Marks0 ptsNo Marks3 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeParticipant Protection/Study Disclosure Statement.Submitted the wording that will be used to inform participants about the study purpose and their rights and protections.2 to >0.0 ptsFull Marks0 ptsNo Marks2 pts
Total Points: 5

Grading Rubrics

Critical Elements

Distinguished

(100%)

Proficient

(85%)

Basic

(70%)

Below Expectations

(50%)

Non-Performance

(0%)

Thesis Statement

Raises the strongest objection to the thesis presented in the assignment. The objection is strongly grounded in research and logical reasoning.

Raises a plausible objection to the thesis presented in the assignment. The objection is mostly grounded in research and logical reasoning.

Raises an objection to the thesis presented in the assignment. The objection is somewhat grounded in research and logical reasoning.

Attempts to raise an objection to the thesis presented in the assignment. The objection is minimally grounded in research and logical reasoning.

The objection to the thesis is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.

Counter Argument

Provides a strong, thorough rebuttal to the objection. The rebuttal effectively demonstrates that the thesis can withstand the objection and applies the principles of charity and accuracy.

Provides a rebuttal to the objection. The rebuttal mostly demonstrates that the thesis can withstand the objection and mostly applies the principles of charity and accuracy.

Provides a limited rebuttal to the objection. The rebuttal somewhat demonstrates that the thesis can withstand the objection and somewhat applies the principles of charity and accuracy.

Attempts to provide a rebuttal to the objection; however, the rebuttal minimally demonstrates that the thesis can withstand the objection and does not apply the principles of charity and accuracy.

The rebuttal is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.

Conclusion

– Provides clear and concise closing remarks that comprehensively summarize the essay. The remarks consider the broader controversy and/or further research that could offer additional insight into the moral solution of the business problem.

Provides closing remarks that summarize the essay. The remarks mostly consider the broader controversy and/or further research that could offer additional insight into the moral solution of the business problem. The closing remarks are somewhat unclear.

Provides closing remarks that minimally summarizes the essay. The remarks minimally consider the broader controversy and/or further research that could offer additional insight into the moral solution of the business problems. The closing remarks are unclear and/or vague.

Attempts to provide closing remarks that summarize the essay, however, the remarks do not consider the broader controversy and/or further research that could offer additional insight into the moral solution of the business problem. The closing remarks are unclear and vague.

The closing remarks are either nonexistent or lack the components described in the assignment instructions.

Written Communication: Context of and Purpose for Writing

Demonstrates methodical application of organization and presentation of content. The purpose of the writing is evident and easy to understand. Summaries, quotes, and/or paraphrases fit naturally into the sentences and paragraphs. Paper flows smoothly.

Demonstrates sufficient application of organization and presentation of content. The purpose of the writing is, for the most part, clear and easy to understand. There are some problems with the blending of summaries, paraphrases, and quotes. Paper flows somewhat smoothly.

Demonstrates a limited understanding of organization and presentation of content in written work. The purpose of the writing is somewhat evident but may not be integrated throughout the assignment. There are many problems with the blending of summaries, paraphrases, and quotes. Paper does not flow smoothly in all sections.

Organization and presentation of content are extremely limited. The purpose of the writing is unclear. There is little or no blending of summaries, paraphrases, and quotes. Paper does not flow smoothly when read.