The Grant Proposal Submission Assignment

The Grant Proposal Submission Assignment

Order ID# 45178248544XXTG457	Plagiarism Level: 0-0.5%	Writer Classification: PhD competent
Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago	Delivery: Minimum 3 Hours	Revision: Permitted
Sources: 4-6	Course Level: Masters/University College	Guarantee Status: 96-99%

Instructions  

The Grant Proposal Submission Assignment

We write papers for students

Tell us about your assignment and we will find the best writer for your paper.

Get Help Now!

 

Final Project Guidelines

The Final Project for this course is a written grant proposal comprised of Assignments from Weeks 6, 7, and 9. The completed Final Project—the Grant Proposal Submission, is due by Day 3 of Week 11.

The Grant Proposal Submission

The Grant Proposal Submission consists of three parts:

Part 1: Need Statement, Goals, and Objectives Part 2: Methodology and Evaluation Plans Part 3: Budget, Budget Narrative, and Sustainability Plan

The Final Project consists of the following components:

• Title Page
• Part 1: Need Statement, Goals, and Objectives
• Part 2: Methodology and Evaluation Plans
• Part 3: Budget, Budget Narrative, Sustainability Plan
• Reference Page

Part 1: Need Statement, Goals, and Objectives (3–4 pages excluding APA references)

• Need Statement
• Establishes the specific problem the proposal will address
• Substantiates the need for addressing this problem by presenting proof of need
• If proof of need requires information that would still need to be accomplished, such as a survey or focus group, the need statement provides a full explanation how this proof would be gathered and what it would address
• Reflects current literature
• Reflects funder interests
• Reflects best practices for grant writing
• Goals
• Align to the need statement
• Clarify what will be accomplished at the completion of the project or at a specific point
• Objectives
• Align to the project goals
• Are specific
• Are measureable

Part 2: Methodology and Evaluation Plans (3–4 pages excluding APA references)

The Methodology clarifies how objectives will be achieved and what activities will lead to that achievement. The Evaluation Plan provides a specific plan for determining how results will be appraised.

• The Methodology Includes:
• Program Description
• Non-personnel Resources
• Facilities, supplies, technology, etc.
• Any non-personnel resources that will appear in the proposal budget should be described
• Personnel Resources
• Who will be assigned or hired?
• Management Plan (Work Plan)
• Who will be responsible for which activities and the timeline associated with those actvities (first quarter, second quarter, third quarter, fourth quarter, ongoing)?
• How the project will be managed?
• The Evaluation Plan Includes:
• Description of the specific criteria that will measure the success of the project
• Explanation of data that will be collected
• Evaluation instruments that will be used and an explanation of why these instruments were selected

Part 3: Budget, Budget Narrative, and Sustainability Plan (3–5 pages)

The project Budget delineates all expected costs associated with a project. The Budget Narrative expands upon the line items, offering further explanation of costs and needs as appropriate. A Sustainability Plan explains to funders how you will continue a project after funding has been exhausted.

• Budget Includes:
• A two-column table
• Column 1 lists the line items of expected project expenses (for example, specific equipment, facilities, and personnel).
• Column 2 lists the projected dollar amount requested for that line item.

Note: Rationale for costs will be provided in the budget narrative.

• Budget Narrative
• The Budget Narrative expands on the line items of the budget, providing a reviewer detail and justification for how you arrived at the projected dollar amounts. For example: If hiring a consultant for $2,000 is a line item, the narrative might explain that this is based on 40 hours @ $50/hour.
• Sustainability Plan
• The Sustainability Plan explains how your agency plans to continue operating this program once the funding has run out.
• It also indicates where future funding and other resources might be obtained.

Note: All relevant cost issues from the budget are addressed in the sustainability plan.

 

RUBRIC
Excellent Quality 95-100%	Introduction 45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.		Literature Support 91-84  points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.			Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score 50-85%	40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.		83-76  points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.			52-49  points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality 0-45%	37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.		75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.			48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow The Grant Proposal Submission Assignment

PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!